Do you know which half of the budget is working?
Every platform reports its own success and each one takes credit for the same sale. The result is a set of dashboards that add up to more revenue than the business made.
A number nobody trusts is worse than no number, because it still gets used.
Most marketing measurement is broken in ways nobody has looked for: duplicate events, consent banners suppressing a third of sessions, conversions counted twice, and attribution models that cannot see the channels they were not built to see.
The work is to establish numbers that survive scrutiny, then to make them available to the people making decisions. That usually means fewer metrics, defined precisely, in one place — rather than another dashboard nobody opens.
Almost every engagement starts with the same finding: the numbers are wrong in ways nobody had looked for. Duplicate events, a thank-you page firing twice, a consent banner suppressing a third of sessions, offline revenue that never makes it back. None of it is dramatic and all of it quietly invalidates the decisions made on top.
The second finding is usually that there are too many numbers. A report with forty metrics is a report nobody reads, and it survives because removing a metric feels like hiding something. Fewer figures, defined precisely, actually get used.
We will audit your tracking against your CRM and tell you plainly what can and cannot be relied on today.
Find out whether your numbers are trueWhat you end up with
Numbers that reconcile
Analytics that agrees with the CRM and the accounts, so the meeting is about what to do rather than whose figure is right.
Budget allocated on evidence
Incrementality rather than platform-reported return, which usually redistributes spend meaningfully.
Measurement that survives privacy changes
Server-side collection and consent handled properly, so the data does not degrade with the next browser release.
One place to look
A view the board and the marketing team both use, rather than a reporting pack per channel.
Is this right for you?
This is for you if
- You are making budget decisions on numbers you are not sure you trust
- You have enough spend that being wrong about allocation costs real money
- You will act on findings, including uncomfortable ones about a favourite channel
It probably is not if
- You want a dashboard rather than a decision; those are cheap and already everywhere
- You want tracking that avoids consent requirements — that is a compliance problem, not a technical one
- Nobody internally will own measurement once we have set it up
“Increased our customer base. They've been helping us for more than 3 years. Neige Marketing is really professional and helpful. We have Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and SEO services with them. We have increased our customers base and they are loyal. Their team really cares about their customers and willing to help all the time.”
What's involved in data and analytics?
- Analytics Audits
- GA4 & Server-Side Tracking
- Consent Mode & Privacy Compliance
- Conversion & Event Design
- CRM & Offline Revenue Integration
- Attribution Modelling
- Incrementality & Geo Testing
- Media Mix Modelling
- Cohort & LTV Analysis
- Executive Dashboards
- Data Warehousing
- Forecasting & Budget Planning
How we get to numbers you can trust
- 01
Audit what you have
Fire every event, submit every form, and reconcile the analytics against the CRM and the bank. It is tedious and it is where most of the findings are.
- 02
Rebuild the measurement
Events designed around business outcomes rather than page views, revenue passed back where it exists, and consent handled so the data is both lawful and usable.
- 03
Establish what is incremental
Holdouts and geo tests to find out what would have happened anyway. No attribution model can answer this, and it is the question the budget actually depends on.
- 04
Report to the decision
One view, few metrics, defined in writing. If a number on it would not change what anyone does, it comes off.
- 05
Make it somebody's job
Measurement decays the moment nobody owns it - a new tag, a site release, a platform update. We leave documentation, alerting on the events that matter, and a defined owner, so the audit does not need repeating in eighteen months.
Questions people ask us
If yours isn’t here, ask us directly — we’ll give you a straight answer, including when the answer is that we’re not the right fit.
Why do our platform reports add up to more revenue than we made?
Because each platform claims every conversion it touched, so a single sale that saw a paid social ad, a search ad and an email is counted three times. Platform reporting is useful for optimising within a channel and unusable for allocating budget between channels; that requires a single reconciled source and incrementality testing.
What is incrementality testing?
Withholding marketing from a comparable group — usually by geography or by audience — and measuring the difference in total revenue rather than in attributed conversions. It is the only practical way to answer whether spend caused sales or merely accompanied them, and it routinely shows that some well-reported campaigns were taking credit for demand that already existed.
Do we need server-side tracking?
It helps where browser restrictions and consent handling are materially degrading data quality, which for most consumer businesses is now the case. It is not a way to avoid consent requirements — data collected without a lawful basis is a compliance problem regardless of where it is collected — and it adds infrastructure to maintain, so it should be a considered decision rather than a default.
How many metrics should a marketing report have?
Few enough that every one changes a decision. In practice that is usually a handful: qualified leads or orders, cost per acquisition, contribution after marketing cost, and one or two leading indicators per channel. Reports grow because removing a metric feels like hiding something, which is how they become unread.
Is GA4 enough on its own?
For traffic and on-site behaviour, generally yes. For deciding budget it is not, because it cannot see offline conversions, cannot resolve what advertising actually caused, and degrades as browser and consent restrictions tighten. It works as one input alongside CRM revenue and incrementality testing, not as the single source of truth.
How do you measure marketing when customers do not convert online?
By passing offline outcomes back into the measurement: CRM stages, call tracking, and revenue imported against the source that generated the enquiry. For businesses where the sale happens weeks later on a phone call, this is the whole job - and it is why online-only dashboards so often show marketing failing at exactly the businesses where it is working.
Find out whether your numbers are true
We will audit your tracking against your CRM and tell you plainly what can and cannot be relied on today.
- A 30-minute call. No pitch deck.
- We audit what you have and tell you what we’d do first.
- You decide. No retainer, no lock-in, nothing to cancel.

